Families' Distress Regarding Coastal Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards
The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.
“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.
“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Seeking Answers and Certainty
The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.
Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.
“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”
He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.