The Rising ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: How Affluence and Hardship Now Sit Side by Side in England.
Within Nunsthorpe, inhabitants occupy homes only several yards from their more affluent counterparts in nearby Scartho village. A six-foot-tall barricade literally separates the two areas in the town of Grimsby, blocking off paths and streets that previously connected them.
“This is the posh-poor divide,” said a resident, aged 37. “It has been there for as long as I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
A Stark National Picture
Analysis of government statistics reveals how deep disparity can run, at times over nothing more than a few metres of asphalt, a line of hedges or a wall. Years of austerity and underinvestment have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now contain a locality ranking as one of the poorest in the nation.
This spread of poverty has coincided with a sharp increase in the number of locations where deprived and affluent people find themselves living side by side. Just a few years ago, just 65 of the most deprived areas bordered one of the least deprived. This number increased to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Divides More Than Space
At this Lincolnshire site, the divide is the biggest in the UK and starkly obvious. The wall transcends being just a metaphorical divide; it creates very real problems for daily routines.
- School runs that should take 15-20 minutes turn into an hour-long detour.
- Reaching key services like supermarkets, schools and employment centres is hindered.
- The site often sees antisocial behaviour, with reports of litter being thrown over the wall and other issues.
“People strive to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you reside facing that,” noted one resident, motioning at the rusted metal wall.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Challenges
At Centre4, workers emphasise that need transcends postcodes. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your level of challenge,” explained director a community leader.
Despite ranking in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate boasts a strong sense and sense of community among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, the neighbouring area ranks among the least deprived 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This pattern is repeated nationally. The Stanhope area in Kent, a mid-century housing development, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in the country. It is immediately adjacent by large houses built in the early 2000s that sit in the wealthiest tenth for employment and living environment.
“They might have bigger houses, but here there’s more community,” commented a long-term resident, aged 63. “You’ll probably find a lot of people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”
The economic divide is evident: an average three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while across the divide comparable properties fetch about £410,000.
Residents speak of a palpable sense of being overlooked. “This part of the community is neglected,” stated resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “Over here our facilities have slowly been taken away, and most of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ paints a portrait of an ever more segregated England, where wealth and need are often awkwardly in close proximity.